- A conventional maglev system is expensive to
operate because it uses more power. Its guideway
is active with components of the motor built in,
making it more expensive to maintain. The magnets
and cooling system which levitate the train are
also expensive to maintain.
- Conventional Noncontact Maglev Costs
and Risks
Noncontact maglev systems face significant development
costs and risks. The new US maglev concepts which have
been proposed must address:
- the unreliability of on-board cryogenic chillers
- the tendency for superconducting magnets to
suddenly lose their magnetism, causing the
vehicle to crash to the guideway
- the need for unproven FRP (fiber-reinforced
plastic) post-tension cables and reinforcing bars
(in place of steel) in their guideway beams
- the health effect on passengers of the strong
magnetic fields generated by superconducting
magnets
- dampening vehicle oscillations
- the complex control systems needed for the
in-guideway motors to make some trains
accelerate, some cruise, and some decelerate on
the same guideway at the same time
- the inability of some maglev systems to navigate
tight corners at high speed, preventing them from
staying within many existing highway
rights-of-way.
Scientific American published a study in its
October, 1997, issue titled: "Maglev:
Racing to Oblivion?" The article concluded
"the main prospect for maglev's future, if any, may
be as a high-tech tourist ride."
|