300 MPH?

Why the emphasis on going high speed, up to 300 MPH? For an intercity transit system to be competitive with air travel, it needs to be fast. If the train will go only 150 MPH, it can only compete with the airlines between city pairs which are 300 miles or less apart. But if the train can go 300 MPH, it can compete effectively between city pairs which are up to 600 miles apart. Above 300 MPH, the aerodynamic drag becomes so great that it is not economical to travel at ground level at these super high speeds.

Skepticism Warranted! Many trains and monorails have claimed to go up to 300 MPH, but few have achieved such speeds. The French TGV, a fairly traditional train, and the German Transrapid maglev have been clocked at over 300 MPH, but few others have. So when a new monorail appears that claims to be able to travel at such speeds, it is good to be skeptical. How do we know that our maglift monorail could achieve such speeds?

Comparison with Traditional Trains
  • A traditional train relies on the flanges on its wheels to guide it and keep it on track. The train's center of gravity it typically about 6' 0" above the flanges. The maglift monorail relies on horizontal guide wheels mounted at mid-level, and the monorail's center of gravity is just 28" above these guide wheels. This low center of gravity makes the maglift monorail inherently more stable and able to handle much higher lateral loads without tipping over.
  • A traditional train has a 4' 8 1/2" gauge; the maglift monorail has a 4' 11" gauge. Thus the maglift monorail has a slightly wider base.
  • The flanges on a traditional train can have an aggressive interaction with the rails, causing the train to hunt and become unstable at high speeds. The maglift monorail's wheels are flangeless and lubricated, allowing it to ride over perturbations that would have caused hunting in a traditional train.
  • A traditional train is driven by traction through its wheels, and at high speeds, loss of contact can degrade performance. The maglift monorail has a linear motor and is driven by electromagnetic forces, thus propulsion of the maglift monorail does not degrade with speed.
  • A traditional train is heavy; a 10-car TGV train weighs over 400 tons and the static and rolling drag is considerable. A maglift monorail of comparable passenger carrying capacity weighs just 210 tons due to its monocoque construction. With its linear motors mounted under the vehicle and on top of the guideway beam, the maglift monorail experiences an upthrust which reduces the weight on the suspension by up to 90% at maximum power (experienced when accelerating or at top speed), giving an effective weight as low as 20 tons. The maglift monorail can have as little as 5% of the static and rolling drag that a TGV has!
  • A TGV train is long; a 10-car train is 590' long giving considerable aerodynamic drag. A 20-segment maglift monorail has comparable passenger carrying capacity, and is only 420' long. Thus the aerodynamic drag, a governing factor at very high speeds, is less with the maglift monorail.
  • This upthrust from the linear motor is known as magnetic lift (maglift). Maglift is an evolution of maglev, retaining 90% of maglev's benefits, while eliminating maglev's disadvantage of magnetic drag (not to mention the increased operating costs and increased capital costs). Magnetic drag is due to the eddy currents etc. caused by maglev's propulsion and guidance systems. In the German EMS technology used by Transrapid, this phenomenon is known as Foucault's effect. In the Japanese EDS technology used by HSST, this phenomenon is known as Joule's effect. The result is that at high speeds, the maglift monorail has less drag than maglev systems.